I read last Sunday's editorial, ","听and couldn't agree more.
I have thought this for years, but the events over the last year have just accentuated this need.
kAmx 8C6H FA :? |25:D@? 2?5 C642== 36:?8 23=6 E@ 5C:G6 FA $E2E6 DEC66E :? E96 324< @7 >J A2C6?EDV 42C] $@ x 92G6 D66? 2 =@E @7 492?86] x 2=D@ =:G65 :? r@=@C25@ 7@C 7@FC J62CD[ 2?5 >J 52F89E6C :D 8@:?8 E@ 4@==686 :? qFC=:?8E@?[ '6C>@?E] $@ x 2> G6CJ 72>:=:2C H:E9 !62C= 2?5 r9FC49 DEC66ED[ 2D 4:E65 :? E96 $E2E6 y@FC?2=VD 65:E@C:2=]听k^Am
kAm$E2E6 $EC66E :D E96 46?E6C @7 |25:D@? 2=@?8 H:E9 E96 r2A:E2= $BF2C6] xE :D H92E >2<6D |25:D@? 3@E9 DA64:2= 2?5 F?:BF6] qFD6D[ E2I:D 2?5 56=:G6CJ G69:4=6D D9@F=5 ?@ =@?86C 36 23=6 E@ 56E6C>:?6 E96 36DE FD6 @7 E9:D 496C:D965 2G6?F6] %96 |25:D@? r:EJ r@F?4:= D9@F=5 D9:7E :ED AC:@C:E:6D E@ E96 3FD:?6DD6D @? E96 DEC66E 3J 7@==@H:?8 E96 DF446DD7F= >@56= @7 q@F=56C[ r@=@C25@[ 2?5 qFC=:?8E@?[ '6C>@?E] xE 2=D@ H:== 96=A :E D9:7E E@ 2 >@C6 72>:=J\7C:6?5=J 6?G:C@?>6?E]k^Am
kAmx <?@H x 2> ?@E 2=@?6 :? E9:D @A:?:@?] x 92G6 925 >2?J D:>:=2C 4@?G6CD2E:@?D H:E9 @E96CD @G6C E96 =2DE ?:?6 >@?E9D] %92?< J@F 7@C AFEE:?8 E9:D :? HC:E:?8]k^Am
kAmy@9? #256C[ |:55=6E@?k^Am





